Hi I would really appreciate some guidance. I am currently enrolled

  • Thread starter Thread starter fys iks!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Guidance Hi
AI Thread Summary
Guidance is sought on pursuing a master's degree in theoretical physics after completing an engineering physics undergraduate program. The individual is currently in their first year of an engineering program in Canada and is concerned about whether an engineering physics degree will adequately prepare them for graduate studies in theoretical physics. It is noted that while it is possible to enter a physics graduate program with an engineering physics background, switching to a physics undergraduate program may provide better preparation and enhance competitiveness for graduate applications. The discussion highlights that in Canada, master's programs serve as a stepping stone to PhDs, contrasting with practices in the US where students often transition directly from bachelor's to PhD programs. Concerns are raised about the general trend of fewer students pursuing graduate studies in physics, prompting further inquiry into the reasons behind this trend.
fys iks!
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi I would really appreciate some guidance. I am currently enrolled in an engineering program and am about to finish my first year. The program i am is has a common first year then branches off in second year, i plan on perusing Engineering Physics.

I have a very deep interest in theoretical physics though and know i would really like to peruse this as a masters degree.

My question is will i be able to do a masters in theoretical physics with a degree in engineering physics? Or should i switch into a physics program for second year?

Like will i really be missing a lot by doing engineering physics vs physics from a theoretical view?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I take it you are not in the US - in the US, one rarely registers for a Masters in Physics. Here, you can definitely get into a Graduate program in Physics, after majoring in Engineering Physics, but I couldn't speak for other countries.
 


thanks for the reply.

Ya I am in Canada. Is there a reason for why a lot of people do not pursue graduate studies?

And i know i can do grad studies in physics with an eng phys degree. But if i were to do grad studies i would want it to be in theoretical physics, and this is why i am worried that a degree in eng phys won't be enough to prepare me .
 


fys iks! said:
Ya I am in Canada. Is there a reason for why a lot of people do not pursue graduate studies?

Gokul didn't say that, he said that it was not common to study for masters courses; I think it's usual in the US to go straight from bachelor level to PhD. Of course, this is not true around the world, and there certainly do exist many masters of science courses in physics in other countries.

And i know i can do grad studies in physics with an eng phys degree. But if i were to do grad studies i would want it to be in theoretical physics, and this is why i am worried that a degree in eng phys won't be enough to prepare me .

If you are interested now in studying theoretical physics at a higher level, then it seems natural to switch to an undergrad degree in physics, since this will give you better preparation, and make your application more competitive.
 


In Canada, you usually get admitted to a Master's program first, and either finish (and leave or go on to Ph.D) or flip over to a PhD if they think your work is sufficient to do so. Unlike the US, it's considered the step before a PhD to determine if you can do novel research, not a consolation prize.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top