Hi,In Mandl&Shaw, when we calculate the covaiant commutation

  • Thread starter Thread starter lornstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutation
lornstone
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

In Mandl&Shaw, when we calculate the covaiant commutation relations for a scalar field we obtain :
[\phi(x),\phi(y)]= i\Delta(x-y)=0
and the last equality stands if x-y is a space-like interval. But I don't understand why. We know that it is zero if the time component is zero and we also know that delta is invariant under proper Lorentz transformation. I don't see why we can't do the correct lorentz transformation (which bring time to zero) with a time-like interval so that it is also zero.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can't Lorentz transform a time-like interval into a space-like interval. The Minkowski norm
<br /> t^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2<br />
is invariant under Lorentz transformations, so a time-like interval (positive norm) cannot be mapped into a space-like interval (negative norm).
 


I got it, thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
951
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top