Hi,may potential, time dependent force field be called

AI Thread Summary
A time-dependent force field cannot be classified as conservative because it violates the conservation of mechanical energy in an isolated system. While the force may be conservative at a specific moment in time, the explicit time dependence of the potential function leads to a non-conservative energy function. The Lagrangian mechanics framework shows that if the Lagrangian has time dependence, the energy will also vary over time. Therefore, a time-dependent potential does not yield a conservative force field. In conclusion, energy conservation does not hold for such time-dependent forces.
apedcen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

may potential, time dependent force field be called conservative?

If so, the mechanical energy conservation of an isolated mechanical system does not hold in such field?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


time dependent means your force field is a function of 4 variables. In math, its equivalent to having a vector field in 4-space. Curl is defined only on R3, but there are some generalizations to the product involving exterior derivatives (which I have not studied).
But when you do a path integral, you have a curve in 4 space which doesn't make physical sense since you can only traverse time in 1 direction, so a closed path is impossible.
 


Curl,
I don't think that we need to incorporate time in definition of conservative force (its just not there). The force may be conservative in a fixed time moment. I don't have problem in calling time dependent force conservative, however the energy conservation will not work on for such force imho.
 


Ok now I think I see what you're saying. Are you considering a vector field which changes with time, but at any instant in time the force field is conservative, i.e. curl F = 0 at a fixed t?
 


Curl said:
Ok now I think I see what you're saying. Are you considering a vector field which changes with time, but at any instant in time the force field is conservative, i.e. curl F = 0 at a fixed t?

I think that's what the OP means.

If that is indeed the case:

A time dependent potential function will not give rise to a conservative force. If we consider the Lagrangian of a system:

L=T-V(t)

Since, V has an explicit time dependence, L has an explicit time dependence. We can also derive the time dependence of the energy function from Lagrangian mechanics:

\frac{dH}{dt}=-\frac{\partial L}{\partial t}

Thus, if L has an explicit time dependence, the energy function will vary in time, and is thus not conserved.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top