High-Energy Doppler Shift & Pair Production

Albertgauss
Gold Member
Messages
294
Reaction score
37
Hi all,

Let's say you are at rest with respect to the galaxy, and you have low energy photons all around you. Now, if I crank my energies up relatvisitcally, the frequency and thus E = hf of those photons will increase. Red Light becomes Blue Light, Blue Light becomes UV, UV to X-ray, and finally X-ray to Gamma Ray. But the limit of not finding photons of higher energy than Gamma is pair production. Could I ever move with high enough energy through the universe that all photons will look like pair-produced particles, first electrons and anti-electrons, then maybe something heavier like protons and anti-protons? That is to say, if I moved with high enough energy, would I not actually see anymore light, but particles where light used to be? I know that you need a recoil atom for pair-production, but let's say these are mostly available.

As a side-note: If there are not recoil atoms for pair production, what kind of photon would I have at such extreme, relatvistic energies?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Albertgauss said:
I know that you need a recoil atom for pair-production, but let's say these are mostly available.

It's not enough for recoil atoms to be available: they have to be at rest relative to *you*, not the photons that are supposed to pair produce. In other words, the critical parameter for pair production is not the photons' energy relative to you, but the photons' energy relative to the recoil atoms.

Of course, one way to ensure that would be to have the recoil atoms be the ones making up you and your rocket ship; but that might not be very pleasant for you. :wink:

Albertgauss said:
If there are not recoil atoms for pair production, what kind of photon would I have at such extreme, relatvistic energies?

Um, a very, very energetic one? Classically, there is no limit to how much energy a photon can have.

Quantum mechanically, one could argue for limits to the energy that can be packed into a single particle, but any such limit is going to apply to you, traveling at ultra-relativistic velocity relative to the rest of the universe, not the photons that have low energy relative to the rest of the universe.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top