High Flow Control with High Pressure and Temperatures

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of controlling high flow, pressure, and temperature in an air cycle machine test bench. Participants explore various control strategies, safety considerations, and equipment specifications related to pneumatic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Blake outlines the specifications for the air cycle machine and seeks advice on controlling flow and pressure, noting the interdependence of these parameters.
  • Some participants suggest that controlling both pressure and flow simultaneously may be theoretically possible with specific control setups, while others argue that one must be prioritized over the other.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of operating high-energy pneumatic systems, emphasizing the need for proper equipment ratings and safety mechanisms.
  • Participants discuss the importance of understanding the relationship between compressor output pressure and tank pressure, with some emphasizing the need for consultation with experts in pneumatic systems.
  • Recommendations for resources and equipment, including control valves and temperature measurement techniques, are provided, highlighting the complexities of control systems in high-pressure applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether it is feasible to control both flow and pressure simultaneously, with some asserting that only one can be controlled effectively. Safety concerns and the need for proper equipment specifications are generally acknowledged, but specific recommendations vary.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in understanding pneumatic system dynamics, such as the implications of pressure loss and the importance of equipment ratings. There is also mention of the need for accurate measurements and control strategies tailored to the specific application.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for engineers and technicians involved in designing or operating pneumatic systems, particularly in high-pressure and high-temperature environments, as well as those interested in control systems for industrial applications.

Blake T
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am currently building a test bench that can input a high amount of flow, pressure and temperature into an Air Cycle machine.
The inlet to the machine requirements are:
Flow = 71 lbs/min
P = 48 PSIa
T = 235 degree F
Diameter = 3 inches

In order to produce these conditions, I have a 75HP Compressor that produces approximately 335CPM, a 10,000 gallon storage tank and a 200KW Heater.

I am looking for a way to control the amount of flow and pressure but know that controlling 1 will affect the other in some way that will make it difficult to get a precise readout. Some questions I have are:

Should I control pressure or flow first or does it not matter?
What kind of control devices for flow/pressure should I look more into (valves, meters, etc)?
Can I control the flow or pressure after or before the heater?
Is the compressor supplying the storage tank at a different pressure than the inlet pressure going to affect the flow?I am looking for any advice or companies that specialize on control valves or systems that can handle such conditions and greatly appreciate your input.

Blake
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF, Blake. :smile:

What is an "air cycle machine", and what is the application?
 
Blake T said:
I am looking for a way to control the amount of flow and pressure but know that controlling 1 will affect the other in some way...
The short answer is that you can't control both parameters, you can only control one. The device you're feeding the air to will dictate the other based on its internal resistance to the flow.

I'm concerned though about the power requirements of this device and the safety of experimenting with industrial scale equipment.
 
Is this for testing the environmental conditioning mechanisms in an aircraft ? And the heat, temperature, and flow rate numbers are to simulate the way these units operate in a passenger plane, right? Maybe an aerospace supplier might have what you need.

As for controlling both pressure and flow simultaneously; I haven’t diagrammed it out in detail, but it should theoretically be possible by placing a pressure compensated flow control followed by a pressure control bypass. So long as the pressure in the line after the flow control is greater than the 48 psi you want to send to the machine, the bypass will dump the excess. And the changes in flow resulting from the regulator venting will be immediately compensated for by the flow control.

I wish to second what @russ_watters siad, for goodness’ sake, please be careful. This is more than enough energy to compromise the structural integrity of your containment vessel (your body). Could you post more about what it is you’re testing, and maybe tell us about the safety mechanisms or your rig?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Please, please tell me that the compressor is rated in CFM, not CPM (whatever that is), and the size of the reservoir in cubic feet. That reservoir had better have an ASME U stamp on it, otherwise it is a very powerful bomb. I have never heard of a pressure vessel size in gallons, only cubic feet (or meters).

The pressure out of the compressor is exactly equal to the pressure in the tank plus line loss. The fact that you do not understand that tells me that you need to consult with somebody that understands pneumatic systems, valves, and controls. The air compressor distributor and/or the valve distributor should be able to recommend somebody.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and russ_watters
LURCH said:
This is more than enough energy to compromise the structural integrity of your containment vessel (your body).
Well said. :smile:
 
I was too harsh in my previous post, sorry about that. My experience with compressed air was in a paper mill where the compressed air system had 5 or 6 air compressors, each with a 200 hp motor. If you wish to do this yourself, I suggest the following resources:

Compressed Air and Gas Data, published by Ingersoll-Rand is an excellent resource. Also the operator's manual for your air compressor. Your tank needs a properly sized relief valve, and a condensate drain. It's a very good idea to calculate the worst case condensate flow.

Control valves. Get some control valve catalogs and study their engineering sections. Learn the difference between equal percentage and linear response, and why it is important. I used a lot of control valves from Masoneilan. I liked their Camflex valves because of versatility - the positioner could be switched between linear and equal percentage.

Temperature measurement. Learn why a temperature sensor for air in a pipe does not measure the temperature of the air.

Temperature control. Learn the difference between on/off, proportional, and PID control with respect to air mass flow and heater thermal mass. A good internet resource to get started is www.omega.com. Learn about the effect of lag on control system response. Your temperature sensor has thermal lag from its mass and time delay lag from its location.

You "air cycle machine" has some sort of flow curve, a plot showing the relation between pressure and flow. You feed it pressure, it controls the flow. You need the maximum and minimum flow rates for your design pressure, then you size the valve to deliver that flow rate over the design range of reservoir pressures. Those calculations also tell whether you need a valve with equal percentage or linear response.

Calculate how long you can run your "air cycle machine", starting with the air tank at full pressure, and ending when the control valve is full open and unable to maintain design pressure to the load. Is that long enough to get the data you need?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Asymptotic and russ_watters
jrmichler said:
Please, please tell me that the compressor is rated in CFM, not CPM (whatever that is), and the size of the reservoir in cubic feet. That reservoir had better have an ASME U stamp on it, otherwise it is a very powerful bomb. I have never heard of a pressure vessel size in gallons, only cubic feet (or meters).

The pressure out of the compressor is exactly equal to the pressure in the tank plus line loss. The fact that you do not understand that tells me that you need to consult with somebody that understands pneumatic systems, valves, and controls. The air compressor distributor and/or the valve distributor should be able to recommend somebody.

It depends on the manufacturer, but I've seen air receiver pressure vessel volumes expressed in gallons, cubic feet, and sometimes both. For instance, Hanson specifies volume in gallons. https://hansontank.us/airtanks.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K