High Pressure Sodium and Metal Halide lamps near plasma ball

AI Thread Summary
Experiments with a plasma globe revealed that a Metal Halide lamp produces a brief white arc that vanishes when the globe is off, while a High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lamp emits a lasting purple glow after the globe is turned off. The persistence of the HPS's purple glow is attributed to phosphorescence, a phenomenon also observed in fluorescent bulbs. Concerns were raised about the risk of the HID lamps exploding without a ballast, but the discussion clarified that the afterglow is a normal characteristic of Sodium lamps. The experiments highlight the unique behaviors of different lamp types in proximity to a plasma ball. Overall, the interaction between HID lamps and plasma globes showcases interesting electrical phenomena.
BetaZeta2016
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
I bought one of these plasma globes, decided to do some experiments with it.
Since a fluorescent bulb will light up if It's put near the plasma ball, i tried the same with two HID lamps.

The Metal Halide shows a very pale white arc, which disappears as soon as the plasma ball is turned off...

But the HPS is different, it emits a purple glow, which stays for several seconds after the plasma ball is shut off.

1. Why is this?

2. Also, since the only thing powering those bulbs is the plasma ball, is there any risk of they exploding due to the lack of a ballast?
 
It's phosphoresence and normal for Sodium lamps, also visible in fluorescent lamps to a lesser extent. See the video where the Sodium lamp is turned off around 4:25 and fades to a purple afterglow.
 
Thanks, understood :)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top