Can High-Speed Blending Heat Up Water Due to Molecular Friction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomasxc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blender
AI Thread Summary
High-speed blending can indeed generate heat in water due to molecular friction, although the effect may be minimal. Stirring water with a spoon already produces slight warming, indicating that any mechanical work done by blender blades could transfer some heat. The blades are designed to slice through the water, resulting in lower force on the water compared to paddles, which would be more effective for heating. Theoretical calculations suggest that the heat generated depends on the work done by the blades, defined as force times distance. Overall, while blending may warm the water slightly, it may not be significant without a different blade design.
thomasxc
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
a thought crossed my mind a few days ago. i wondered if you had water in an extremely high speed blender, would the friction between all the water molecules cause the water to heat up?..any thoughts on this would be appreciated.


Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just stirring water with a spoon will cause it to warm slightly. How much heat are you wanting?
 
The total amount of heat transferred to the water would be the work done of the water by the blades of the blender. Work is force times distance.

W=Fd

If the blades are going quickly, they obviously travel quite a distance. However, the blades are oriented to slice through the water, so the force of the water on the blades is low. If you wanted to heat the water, paddles would be easier than blades
 
for now, i didnt want to experiment. it was only a theoretical question.and i am familar with heat and work, ect. equations.
 
*et cetera
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top