High Voltage Low current from a step up transformer

AI Thread Summary
A step-up transformer increases voltage while decreasing current, leading to a brighter bulb connected to the secondary coil despite lower current. The brightness of bulb Y is determined by the power it receives, which can be calculated using P = E²/R, indicating that higher voltage results in higher power if resistance remains constant. The current in the secondary coil is not fixed and varies based on the load, meaning it can still provide sufficient power to light bulb Y brightly. The relationship between primary and secondary currents is complex, as they depend on the load and are not directly comparable. Understanding these principles clarifies how a step-up transformer operates and affects bulb brightness.
john liang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

From what I have read, if a bulb X is connected to the input voltage of a step-up transformer, and another similar bulb Y is connected to the output voltage (secondary coil), then Y will be brighter than X.

From Joule's law of P = V I, it seems that the output voltage will be higher and the current will be lower.

My question is, if the current in the secondary coil is lower, how come the bulb Y is brighter?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The current in the secondary is not a given quantity. It's determined by the voltage E and the resistance R of the bulb. Therefore the correct form of Joule's Law to use is P = E2/R, showing that the power increases as the voltage is increased.
 
The current in the secondary is not a given quantity. It's determined by the voltage E and the resistance R of the bulb. Therefore the correct form of Joule's Law to use is P = E2/R, showing that the power increases as the voltage is increased. - Bill_K

Isn't it a fact that if the output voltage of the secondary coil is say 5x higher than the input voltage of the primary coil, the output current is 1/5 of the input current?
Thanks
 
Welcome to Physics Forums.

The current in the primary coil is different than the current in the lightbulb connected across it. They are in parallel with each other, so they have the same voltage but not (necessarily) the same current.

Therefore, your correct statement about the relative currents in the primary and secondary does not apply to the currents in the lightbulbs.
 
The current in the secondary is variable depending on the load connected to it. The maxim current the secondary can supply is 1/5 of the input current. The input current is also variable and depends on how the transformer is loaded. You need to go back to E = IR and understand how current changes with load.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top