Can a cross product be defined between two Hilbert space vectors?

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
The equivalent of a dot product in Hilbert space is:
\langle f | g \rangle = \int f(x) g(x) dx
And you can find the angle between functions/vectors f and g via:
\theta = arccos\left( \frac{\langle f | g \rangle}{\sqrt{\langle f|f \rangle \langle g|g \rangle}} \right)

So is it possible to come up with a cross product between two Hilbert space vectors? I know with discrete dimensionalities, you can only have vectors result from cross products in 3D and 7D, but is it possible here?
If not, is it possible to get something akin to a bivector, like with 4D cross products?

Is it possible to get something like:
\langle f | \times |g \rangle = | h \rangle
where
\langle f |h \rangle = 0
\langle g |h \rangle = 0

Maybe the cross product is a more complicated object akin to a bivector, like something of the form:
\langle f | \times |g \rangle = | h \rangle | k \rangle
or
\langle f | \times |g \rangle = | h \rangle \langle k |
Is there a formal way to construct a cross product like this in Hilbert space?

As an aside: if
cos \theta = q
then
sin \theta = \sqrt{1 - q^2}

And for cross products, the maginitude is |A \times B| = |A||B|sin \theta

So it seems to follow from the second equation in this post, that the magnitude of a Hilbert cross product is:
| \langle f | \times |g \rangle | = \sqrt{ \langle f|f \rangle \langle g|g \rangle - \langle f | g \rangle^2 }
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In 3D, the cross-product is the Hodge dual of the wedge product of the two vectors. If the vectors are 1D, their wedge product is 2D, and in an N-dimensional space the hodge dual of this would be (N-2)-dimensional. So at least it's not just a vector(ket), it might be something tensorial but I don't know if such a thing is defined in any way in a quantum Hilbert space.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top