Hinged lever held by a string - Problem regarding forces

AI Thread Summary
When analyzing a hinged lever held by a string, the intersection of the contact force from the wall and the tension in the string will always align directly above the load's center, regardless of the load's position. This phenomenon is supported by a theorem in mechanics stating that for a body in static equilibrium, the lines of action of three forces must intersect at a single point or be parallel. The weight of the load acts as one of these forces, maintaining this relationship. If this were not the case, a resultant couple would cause rotation. This principle is foundational in statics and has historical significance in the development of force analysis methods.
sfsy1
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/7673/lever.gif

I've come upon this phenomenon that as you shift the load left, or right, or anywhere along the lever, the intersection of the directions for the contact force due to the wall and the tension from the string will always be directly above the center of the load. I figured this out by accurate drawing.

However, is this always true? If Yes, how do you prove it? (i.e., formulas? theories? rules?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's always true. There's a theorem in mechanics that says if three forces act on a body that is in static equilibrium, the lines of action of those three forces must intersect at a single point (or all be parallel). In your example, the weight of the load acts as one of those forces and its line of action is vertical. (I don't know if this theorem has a name--somebody must have been the first to notice it.)
 
thanks
 
If it were not so, there would be a resultant couple and 'something' would rotate. I think that the old system of Bow's (spelling) Notation was based on this fact. We did it a A level, I remember, and it was used for working out the forces in complicated, loaded frameworks in our 'statics' course.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top