History of Cloning: Learn About Cloning & Research Projects

Thread starter alika
Start date Nov 8, 2006
Tags

Cloning History

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the history of cloning and the request for project ideas or resources related to cloning. Participants emphasize the importance of conducting personal research before seeking help, suggesting that effort is crucial in understanding the topic. Some users express frustration over the quality of available information, noting that most resources highlight negative aspects of cloning. The conversation encourages sharing specific challenges faced in research to facilitate better assistance. Overall, the thread highlights the need for proactive engagement in learning about cloning and its implications.

Nov 8, 2006

alika

can some one tell the history of cloning to me? but i really want a nice project.or maybe someone send to me site about cloning.

Physics news on Phys.org

Nov 8, 2006

Stevedye56

Why don't you do some research and show some effort? Then if you're still haveing trouble, show what the problem is.

Nov 9, 2006

alika

i found somethings but they are all bad things 1 or 2 is good and i have help..

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »