History of Emerging Infectious Diseases

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the history and emergence of infectious diseases, exploring factors that complicate the identification of new pathogens and the role of media in shaping public perception of these diseases. Participants touch on historical examples, current events, and the implications of global mobility on disease spread.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the complexities involved in identifying new pathogens, citing factors such as lack of animal models and pre-existing theories of disease.
  • One participant mentions the case of Dr. Barry Marshall and his work on Helicobacter pylori, highlighting the challenges in demonstrating pathogenicity in animal models.
  • Another participant suggests that sensational media coverage may contribute to public perception and understanding of emerging diseases.
  • There is a reference to Colony Collapse Disorder and its potential viral etiology, with mention of military involvement in pathogen detection.
  • Some participants propose that new pathogens often emerge from close contact with domesticated species and that humans provide a new environment for these pathogens to thrive.
  • Concerns are raised about the perception of emerging diseases being limited to foreign regions, with a call for awareness among healthcare professionals regarding unusual cases.
  • One participant reflects on how media reports can influence perceptions of health issues, particularly in relation to emerging diseases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the factors influencing the emergence of infectious diseases and the role of media, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference specific historical cases and current events, but the implications of these examples are not universally agreed upon. The role of media in shaping perceptions is also noted as a contentious point.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,584
Reaction score
7,541
A question about purified water got me to thinking about water-borne diseases which lead me to -

History of emerging infectious diseases
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_emerging_infectious_diseases
The discovery of new pathogens is an important activity in the field of medical science. Pathogens are organisms that cause disease through infection. Scientists have discovered viruses, bacteria, protozoa, fungi, helminthes (worms) and prions that have proven to be pathogens. A Center for Disease Control program begun in 1995 identified over a hundred patients with life threatening illnesses which were considered to be of an infectious cause, but could not be identified with any known pathogen. [1] The association of pathogens with disease can be a complex and controversial process, in some cases requiring decades or even centuries to achieve. Factors which have been identified as impeding the identification of pathogens include the following:

1. Lack of animal models . . . .
2. Pre-existing theories of disease . . . .
3. Variable pathogenicity . . . .
4. Organisms that look alike but behave differently . . . .
5. Lack of research effort . . . .

For example, Dr. Barry Marshall was the co-discoverer of the theory that a bacterial infection with Helicobacter pylori was responsible for causing most peptic or stomach ulcers. After winning the 2005 Nobel Prize for this work, Dr. Marshall's described his difficulty in producing stomach ulcers in animals by infecting them with the bacteria. He infected piglets with the bacteria, but they did not become ill. He then infected himself by swallowing a culture. His colleague [Dr. J Robin Warren] then examined him and found damage consistent with peptic ulcers which was not present previously.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_peptic_ulcer_disease_and_Helicobacter_pylori

Marshall, Barry, "The discovery that Helicobacter pylori, a spiral bacterium, caused peptic ulcer disease", in Helicobacter Pioneers, pp. 165-202.

Monique had a thread on the 2005 Nobel prize in Physiology and Medicine.

Really fascinating stuff, and also worrisome because of emerging diseases given the mobility of the global economy.

The US has seen invasive species, plant and animal, from other parts of the planet. I suppose this applies to pathogens too. It seems we've seem an increased frequency of tropical diseases, e.g. W. Nile virus.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
If I could add a #6: Sensational media coverage
 
Speaking of- an update on Colony Collapse Disorder is due on 9/6. The latest information hints at a virus. Thus far everyone seems to be keeping a lid on it but there was mention of ports of entry not long ago.

I can't find the direct link but Popular Mechanics ran a blurb about the Army's involvement in pathogen detection.
 
The etiology of new diseases is interesting. Hans Zinnser started the concept which was later followed up. 'Guns Germs and Steel' is one of the descendents of this work.

New pathogens appear regularly. Look it at it from a sort of teliological point of view -- humans are a vast untapped source of food and shelter for parasites. If a pathogen can make the jump from some other animal species to us, remain infective, and thrive - well, then it's found a new home.

A lot of our major pathogens have been derived from close contact with other domesticated species - smallpox, cholera, etc. New threats also arise from old sources moved to a new home - West Nile Virus in North America, for example.
 
That's a good point.

The notion that emerging disease is somehow limited to "over there" may not be the norm anymore. Physicians and vets are often the first to see the signs of illness yet many appear to take the high road when they encounter something out of the ordinary. Hence the reference to the role of the media.

Sensational reports about bugs crawling out of lesions and unusual filaments in wounds comes to mind. Judging by what we know as far as the possibility of contaminants and
unsafe manufacturing practices it doesn't seem unreasonable to suspect this type of complaint could have some merit. At least it doesn't now. Maybe not a year ago.

Hindsight again, but I often wonder how the media shapes our perception of what is and isn't when it comes to health and emerging disease. It doesn't matter what my thoughts are. It matters what Dr. Smith down the road thinks when he encounters something unusual.
 
Cutaneous anthrax in the US news:

http://www.wfsb.com/news/14049418/detail.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A current release:

http://www.medpagetoday.com/InfectiousDisease/GeneralInfectiousDisease/tb/6690

At this didn't reach the tabloid stage before being diagnosed. Sensible reporting at it's best.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
10K