Nobel prize in Physiology and Medicine

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren for their discovery of Helicobacter pylori and its association with gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. Participants explore the implications of this discovery, its historical context, and the merits of the award.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight the significance of Marshall and Warren's work in challenging established beliefs about the causes of peptic ulcers, which were previously attributed to stress and lifestyle factors.
  • There is mention of the methods used by Marshall and Warren, including fibre endoscopy and culture techniques, which some argue made their case compelling.
  • One participant notes that Marshall ingested Helicobacter pylori as part of their research, suggesting this aspect was overlooked in the initial reports.
  • Concerns are raised about the deserving nature of the award, with some questioning whether the recognition is warranted given the historical context of the discovery.
  • Another participant argues that the discovery has led to effective treatments for ulcers, implying that this contributes to the award's justification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the merit of the Nobel Prize awarded to Marshall and Warren, with some questioning its deserving nature while others support it based on the impact of their findings on ulcer treatment.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the historical context of peptic ulcer research and the prevailing beliefs at the time of the discovery, indicating that the discussion may be influenced by varying interpretations of the significance of the findings.

Monique
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,229
Reaction score
61
Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren

for their discovery of

"the bacterium Helicobacter pylori and its role in gastritis and peptic ulcer disease"
Peptic ulcer – an infectious disease!

This year's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine goes to Barry Marshall and Robin Warren, who with tenacity and a prepared mind challenged prevailing dogmas. By using technologies generally available (fibre endoscopy, silver staining of histological sections and culture techniques for microaerophilic bacteria), they made an irrefutable case that the bacterium Helicobacter pylori is causing disease. By culturing the bacteria they made them amenable to scientific study.

In 1982, when this bacterium was discovered by Marshall and Warren, stress and lifestyle were considered the major causes of peptic ulcer disease. It is now firmly established that Helicobacter pylori causes more than 90% of duodenal ulcers and up to 80% of gastric ulcers. The link between Helicobacter pylori infection and subsequent gastritis and peptic ulcer disease has been established through studies of human volunteers, antibiotic treatment studies and epidemiological studies.
http://nobelprize.org/medicine/laureates/2005/press.html
 
Biology news on Phys.org
is it really deserving?
 
By using technologies generally available (fibre endoscopy, silver staining of histological sections and culture techniques for microaerophilic bacteria), they made an irrefutable case that the bacterium Helicobacter pylori is causing disease. By culturing the bacteria they made them amenable to scientific study.

They forgot to mention that to make their case, Marshall injested some Helicobacter pylori.
 
Yeah, I was looking for that myself in the report :smile:
 
They forgot to mention that to make their case, Marshall injested some Helicobacter pylori.
I was looking for that myself in the report :smile:
cronxeh said:
is it really deserving?
As said they challenged prevailing dogmas, that must have played a major role in the nomination.
 
cronxeh said:
is it really deserving?
Considering how many people suffer from ulcers, and that this finding resulted in some effective ways of treating them other than telling people to "take it easy" or "go on vacation" or "take some antacids," yes, it seems deserving.
 

Similar threads

2021 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Svante Pääbo wins Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for Paleogenomics
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Nobel Prize 2020 in Physiology or Medicine
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
2019 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
History of Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Peer Review: Objective or Subjective?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Interesting article about the Nobel Prize "Rule of Three"
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Celebrating Fire and Mello's Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Medical Nobel Prize in Medicine Announced
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K