History History of Humanity: From Chimps to Us

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of defining humanity, particularly in relation to genetic similarities and differences between humans and chimpanzees. It highlights that while early studies suggested a 99.3% genetic similarity, more recent findings indicate a lower percentage, typically over 90%, with some studies proposing differences of 1-2% or even up to 5-6% depending on the genes compared. The conversation emphasizes that humans did not evolve from chimpanzees; rather, both species share a common ancestor from around six million years ago. Additionally, the definition of humanity extends beyond genetics to include cultural and societal factors, complicating the identification of a specific point in human evolution.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
I had to laugh at some of the criteria for (humanity) discribed in this Wiki
article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanity, to be exact i find it hard to
point a finger at the time (humans) came into the evolutionary picture, ie
how many genes separate humans from chimps, how far is a chimp away from humanity?
 
Science news on Phys.org
wolram said:
how many genes separate humans from chimps, how far is a chimp away from humanity?

Back before they decoded both genomes they did rough test tube coagulation experiments and gave the proportion of shared genes as 99.3 %. Of course in those days they didn't really know how many genes each genome contained.

Nowadays the number given is lower, but still over 90 %. Just in the last week or so a paper appeared that claimed the difference between us and the chimps wasn't different genes per se but the different expression of the same genes.

Of course you know, wolram, that we aren't descended from chimps or they from us. Rather both species (and Bonobos) descend from a common ancestor. We split something like 6 million years ago.
 
The article states that the genetic difference between humans and chimpanzees is approximately 1-2%. However, this measurement can vary depending on the specific genes being compared. Some studies have suggested that the genetic difference could be as high as 5-6%. Additionally, the article mentions that the concept of humanity is not solely based on genetics, but also on cultural and societal factors. Therefore, it is difficult to pinpoint a specific moment in time when humans came into the evolutionary picture.
 
There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Back
Top