Holography and Calabi-Yau compactifications

  • Thread starter Thread starter crackjack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Holography
crackjack
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Holography separates the space of non-gravity (gauge) and gravity (string) theories into boundary and bulk. As I see it, CY compactifications do no such separations. So, aren't they fundamentally inconsistent with each other?

I also see more and more string theorists starting to believe in the general holographic conjecture that there is a string theory for every gauge theory. But they look at this duality more as look-up table for individual gauge theories (like in QCD, condensed matter etc). Why has holography not gained *enough* popularity in the context of unification? In this unification context, CY compactification still rules the field.

If there are strong reasons to believe that holography might not be best suited for unification, can both ideas - holography & CY compactifications - coexist?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that in AdS/CFT the bulk is compactified on spheres. Does Calabi-Yau compactifications of string theory have CFT duals?
 
There are so-called Klebanov-Strassler solutions, also known as "warped deformed conifold", that have CFT duals http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0007191" . These manifolds are Calabi-Yau, up to a conformal warp factor, and are typically regarded as describing some local geometry that looks like a long throat glued to some compact Calabi-Yau bulk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks smoit. I was also informed of these strings on conifolds with warped throat dual to cascading gauge theories, a little after I posted here. I also found the following lecture notes on these:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0205100
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0505153

Also:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0502113
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503079 (has an attractive title)

So, it seems some aspects of conventional CY compactifications, with some additions, are compatible with holography.

@petergreat: Yes, it seems so. The lecture notes above have more explanations.
 
crackjack said:
I also see more and more string theorists starting to believe in the general holographic conjecture that there is a string theory for every gauge theory.
Just as an aside, is the opposite -- that there is a gauge theory for every string theory -- generally thought to be true, as well?
 
S.Daedalus said:
Just as an aside, is the opposite -- that there is a gauge theory for every string theory -- generally thought to be true, as well?

It's fairly straightforward to extend the AdS/CFT correspondence to N=1 superconformal theories in 4d. The dual theory to these is IIB theory on \text{AdS}_5\times X_5, where X_5 is a so-called Einstein-Sasaki manifold. The properties of an Einstein-Sasaki manifold guarantee that the cone over it is a noncompact Calabi-Yau manifold, i.e.

ds_6^2 = dr^2 +r^2 ds_{X_5}^2

is a Ricci-flat metric.

There are examples in the literature of nonsupersymmetric correspondences that are understood to some extent. I'm not particularly familiar with the details, but some of these examples involve nonsupersymmetric orbifolds of supersymmetric theories or perhaps the geometry of tilted brane configurations. Examples like that are probably the only ones where you have much of a dictionary on both sides.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top