Homework help - universe density & curvature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the radius of curvature and maximum distance in a universe with a mass density of 10 protons/m3. The first part of the problem is understood, but the second part regarding maximum distance remains unclear. The Friedman equation indicates a maximum scale factor of 10/9, and the universe is identified as matter-dominated with positive curvature. It is suggested that instead of asking for maximum distance, one could determine the distance needed to return to the starting point, which would be half of the maximum distance. The final step involves calculating the radius of the 3-sphere at maximum expansion to find the answer.
xdrgnh
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
1. If the current mass density in the Universe was about 10 protons/m3 what would be the current radius of its curvature? What would be the maximum distance between the two points in the Universe?
I got the first part but not the 2nd. If I solve the Friedman equation I get the max scale factor to be density/(density -1) which in this case is 10/9. Again I'm posting here because last the people in the homework help section don;t know much cosmology. Do I need to solve for the Hubble distance for this universe. btw this is a matter dominated universe with positive curvature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, this is the geometry of a 3-sphere. So instead of asking the maximum distance, why not ask what distance would have to be traveled in order to come back to where you start? The maximum distance between any two objects will naturally be half that.

All that remains after that is figuring out the radius of this 3-sphere at maximum expansion, and you should have the answer.

Does that help?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top