Homogeneous Differential Equation with Initial Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter jahnybrew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homogeneous
jahnybrew
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I've been out of the loop with differentials for some time, and was hoping to get some direction with these..
Given that:

(x^2)y" + 2x(x-1)y' - 2(x-1)y = 0

A) Explain why the general theory doesn't guarantee a unique soln to the equation satisfying the initial conditions y(0) = 0, y'(0) = 1. And show that y1(x)=x is a solution of the equation.

B) Using the method of reduction of order, find a second linearly independent solution y2(x) of the equation.

C) Is there a unique solution to the eqn satisfying the intial conditions y(0)=0, y'(0)=1?

Any help or clues with this would really be helpful because I'm not very familiar with it, and if someone could talk through any part of the question would be really appreciated.

Thanks:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you simply plug in y_1{(x)}=x you should notice that this solves the differential equation. This is your first solution. Are you familiar with the method of reduction of order? Your second solution will be of the form y_2{(x)}=u(x)y_1{(x)}. Plug this into your differential equation and see if you can solve for u(x) which then allows you to solve for your second solution. After solving the equation simply plug in your initial conditions.
 
In order to answer A, you will need to tell why the "existence and uniqueness" theorem for differential equations does not apply here. The first "existence and uniqueness" theorem you learn is usually for first order differential equations. Here, if you let u= y and v= y', your second order equation becomes x^2v'+ 2x(x-1)v- (2x-1)u= 0 or
v'= \frac{2x(x-1)v- (2x-1)u}{x^2}<br /> which, together with u'= v, gives two first order equations which you can think of as a single first order equation for the <b>vector</b> <u, v>. And the proof of the basic "existence and uniqueness" theorem goes over easily to vector valued functions.<br /> <br /> Now, what "existence and uniqueness" theorems does your textbook have?
 
hi,

I'm not entirely sure how to apply them. all we have learned so far is the Wronskian that checks for linear independence..?

The theorems in the book are,
1. if p(x), q(x) are continuous functions on I and x is in I, then the IVP hasa unique solution y(x) on I.

2. Suppose the IVP has continuous coefficients p(x), q(x) on I. Then two solutions y1 and y2 of the IVP on I are linearly dependent on I, if and only if their Wronskian is zero at some x in I. If there is an x in I at which W is not zero, then y1, y2 are linearly independent on I.

3. If coefficients p(x), q(x) of IVP are continuous on some open I, then the IVP has a general solution on I.

4. Suppose the IVP has continuous coefficients p(x), q(x) on open interval I. Then every solution y=Y(x) or the IVP of I is of the form Y(x)=c1y1(x)+c2y2(x), where y1, y2 are the basis of solution, and c1, c2 are suitable constants.


I thought that if i were able to show the DEQ isn't continuous at 0, then there would be no unique solution to the equation with the initial conditions given?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top