Homomorphism SL(2,C) with restricted Lorentz

  • I
  • Thread starter gentsagree
  • Start date
  • #1
96
1
We have that

[tex]\Lambda^{\mu}_{\nu} = \frac{1}{2}Tr(\overline{\sigma}^{\mu}A\sigma^{\nu}A^{\dagger}) [/tex]

I would like to make sense of the statement that this is a homomorphism because the correspondence above is preserved under multiplication.

Can someone clarify how I could see this?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
96
1
Nevermind. While the tool needed was clear from the beginning, i.e. an identity about products of traces, I was completely oblivious to the existence of one. It turns out that

[tex]
\sum_{\mu}Tr(G\sigma_{\mu})Tr(\overline{\sigma}^{\mu}H) = 2 Tr(GH)
[/tex]

While I still don't know the proof of this, this is the correct answer.
 
  • #3
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,373
459
A map of the form:
[itex] \phi : A \rightarrow B[/itex]
[itex] a \rightarrow b=\phi(a)[/itex]
is roughly speaking an homomorphism if for elements [itex]x, y \in A[/itex] the [itex] \phi(x) \cdot \phi(y) = \phi(x*y)[/itex]
and that's why the comment about multiplication.

As for the proof of your last equation in post2, if I recall well you can prove it better by writting the traces with summed indices:
[itex] G_{ai} \sigma_{ia}^\mu \bar{\sigma}^\mu_{jb} H_{bj}[/itex]
and then using seperately the [itex]\sigma^0, \sigma^k[/itex]'s and use their completeness relation (generalization of the : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_matrices#Completeness_relation)... but I don't really remember the complete proof...
 
Last edited:
  • #4
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,373
459
yup it's straightforward (5-6 single-expression lines depending on how rigorous you want to be) with the completeness relation I gave you (obviously I just tried it o0))...

So I guess it would be a better "exercise" for you to prove the completeness relation for the pauli matrices that is given in the wiki article I sent you.
 

Related Threads on Homomorphism SL(2,C) with restricted Lorentz

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
719
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
Top