What factors affect the displacement range in Hooke's Law?

AI Thread Summary
Hooke's Law (F=-kx) is primarily applicable to small displacements, as it describes the linear relationship between force and displacement in elastic materials. The displacement range can vary among objects due to their physical properties, such as length and material composition. Longer elastic objects may exhibit greater displacements within the linear regime compared to shorter ones. The limitations of Hooke's Law arise because atoms can only be stretched to a certain point before breaking becomes energetically favorable. Ultimately, the relationship between force and displacement is more complex than Hooke's Law suggests, especially at larger strains.
Grhymn
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I was told that Hooke's Law (F=-kx) only accounts for small displacements. But for some objects the displacement can be greater than with others. I was wonderinig which quality of the objects is responsible for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Grhymn said:
I was told that Hooke's Law (F=-kx) only accobunts for small displacements. But for some objects the displacement can be greater than with others. I was wonderinig which quality of the objects is responsible for this?

Actually, Hooke's Law is limited to small strains (displacement normalized to initial length). So a long elastic object, when stretched, could produce a larger displacement in the linear regime compared to a shorter object.

The limited linear regime arises for most materials because atoms can only be stretched so far before it becomes energetically favorable for them to break instead. Even the linear model is only an approximation to a more complicated relationship between bonded atoms.*

*(If you're really interested: Any equilibrium energy well can be approximated as a parabola for small displacements, and the quadratic form of strain energy gives rise to a linear restoring force that increases with displacement and is equivalent to Hooke's Law.)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top