Hooke's Law: Explaining Why Weight Changes Cause Different Spring Movement

  • Thread starter Thread starter ConquestAce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The observed discrepancy in spring extension under different weights suggests that the spring does not adhere strictly to Hooke's Law at higher loads. The k constant, which represents the spring's stiffness, appears to change with varying weights, indicating that the spring may yield or deform plastically under heavier loads. This behavior implies that the spring can exhibit linear elasticity for smaller weights but transitions to non-linear behavior as the load increases. A proposed experiment involves systematically adding weights and measuring extension to determine if the relationship remains linear or begins to curve at higher loads. This investigation could provide clearer insights into the spring's mechanical properties and behavior under different stress levels.
ConquestAce
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How come a spring with applied weight of 1000 g goes down 9.8 cm but the same spring with applied weight of 500g goes only 3.7 cm down?

This is from my own lab that I preformed, and I need help in explaining why this occurs. I searched online but didn't get any clear answers, my only assumption at the moment is that k constant is the reason why this occurs, but I am not too sure.

The K values for the same spring is differnt when I calculate it, and I am confused on why that happens.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously the spring doesn't follow Hooke's Law completely. More than likely it is following Hooke's Law for small loads but it starts to yield at higher loads.
 
An interesting experimental followup would be to take the same spring and put 100g, 200g, 200g, ... 900g on it, measure the amount of extension for each, and plot a graph. Does it start out as more or less a straight line, and then start to curve with larger weights, or does it curve all the way?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top