Horava Lifshitz Gravity: Theory of Quantum Gravity or TOE? Viable Option?

  • Thread starter Thread starter palmer eldtrich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
palmer eldtrich
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Its is said that LQG is not trying to be a theory of everything (TOE), just a theory of quantum gravity, unlike string theory. But what about Horava Lifshitz gravity , is it claiming to be a theory of just quantum gravity or also a TOE?
Is it still considered viable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HL gravity is not a TOE. It is still considered viable.
 
  • Like
Likes palmer eldtrich
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top