Horizontal velocity over an uneven surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of a ball sliding over an uneven, frictionless surface while transitioning from a height of 8m to 3m. Initially, it was assumed that the horizontal velocity would remain constant at 10 m/s due to the absence of horizontal forces. However, using the conservation of energy equation revealed that the ball's speed actually increases to 14 m/s at point q. This increase is attributed to the normal force acting on the ball, which has a horizontal component that affects its velocity as it moves downwards. The clarification emphasizes the importance of considering the normal force in such scenarios, akin to roller coaster dynamics.
rasen58
Messages
71
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A small ball of m=1kg at height hp = 8m at point p, is given an initial horizontal speed vp = 10 m/s. It slides over an uneven frictionless surface. What is speed vq of the ball at height hq = 3m at point q?
upload_2014-12-24_11-9-4.png


Homework Equations


Ui + KEi = Uf + KEf

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured out how to find the velocity at point q, but when I first did the problem, I thought that the horizontal velocity wouldn't change because there is no horizontal force acting on the ball. The surface is frictionless, so going back to kinematics, if you throw a ball at an angle, the horizontal velocity doesn't change because gravity only acts downward, so I thought it would remain at 10 m/s. But the speed actually increased to 14 m/s after I solved it using the total energy equation.
Why was my first way wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case the ball isn't falling, but sliding. The surface exercises a normal force on the ball that is directed perpendicular to the surface (hence the name normal). That normal force has a non-zero horizontal component, so it increases v when the ball goes down, and it slows the thing down when going uphill. Roller coaster physics !

(Of course, at Q the normal force is straight up again).
 
  • Like
Likes rasen58
Oh I see! I forgot about the normal force here. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top