Hormone Longevity: What is the Typical Duration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icakeov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    longevity
AI Thread Summary
Hormones produced by the body do not remain indefinitely; they have a relatively short lifespan and are typically broken down after fulfilling their function. Once a hormone interacts with a cell, it does not return to circulation. Instead, transport molecules like lipoproteins help carry hormones in the bloodstream, while the liver processes unused hormones. The concept of half-life is crucial, as hormones are not designed to linger in the body for long periods. Additionally, feedback mechanisms play a significant role in hormone regulation, where the activation of one hormone can trigger the production of antagonistic hormones, effectively turning off the original hormone's activity. This dynamic is exemplified in the regulation of blood glucose levels through insulin and glycogen.
icakeov
Messages
379
Reaction score
27
I had a hard time finding an answer to this one:

Do hormones that are created by the body get to stick around much in the body?

What I mean by this is, are they just "one-use" items or do they last longer in the body and can be useful long-term too?

For example, if we get angry, once we calm down, are those adrenaline molecules flushed out of our system in different ways, or do they get broken down (or not), reintegrated into the body and somehow get used again later when needed?

In essence, what is a typical hormone longevity?

I hope I made sense with this one. Many thanks for any thoughts!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Here is a simplified version of how hormones react with receptor sites:
http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/endocrine/moaction/surface.html

Answer to your question - the hormone is on a one way path after it contacts a cell. It never leaves. Also. There are a lot of transport molecules like lipoproteins and eiconosoids that drag things around in the blood stream. They act like taxi cabs. The liver processes these unused packets of hormones after a short while.

So the best model would be what is termed a half-life, which is fairly short. Hormones do not float around aimlessly for long.

Plus, there are feedback mechanisms - once some process is initiated, its activity 'gets noticed' and some other antagonistic hormone may start to be produced. This turns off the original production and may actually reverse what was started.

Lookup glycogen and insulin control of blood glucose levels for a model of feedback loops.

Even less detail:
http://www.news-medical.net/health/Hormone-Interactions-with-Receptors.aspx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja and icakeov
Super helpful, thanks Jim!
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top