Hossless Anti-Gravity: Bojowald's Landmark Paper & Beyond

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anti-gravity
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
Here are 109 articles (or books)
http://arxiv.org/cits/gr-qc/0102069?skip=75&db=spires
which all cite Bojowald's landmark paper where he determined that in Loop cosmology gravity REPELS at very high density. Here is the orig:
http://arxiv.org/gr-qc/0102069

the original paper dealt with an isotropic case (the analysis was simplified by making things uniform or symmetric) but since then people have extended the result, assuming less and less, to make it more general.

AFAICS this has no direct connection with the "anti-gravitation" that Sabine H is discussing in her thread of that name. But maybe it is an amusing coincidence.

In any case there is a considerable literature now which takes seriously the possibility that the effect of gravity reverses at very high density, and becomes repellent.
Bojowald, Singh, and others have modeled stellar-size collapse in some detail and Singh has proposed that the model may have an observable signature which can be sought in GRBs.

In any case reversed gravity is a feature of the LQC model, which has the correct classical limit and is currently being studied for observational testing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi marcus,

that is indeed interesting! I guess the interest in such behaviour is strongly supported by the cosmological puzzles, in the first line the dark energy/dark matter problems, which indicate that we are really missing something important. That - among other things - is a reason why I think experimental focus will probably shift away from colliders and towards astro/cosmology.

B.
 
hossi said:
Hi marcus,

that is indeed interesting!

I am delighted by your interest. If you ever want to pursue the phenomenology of (loop) quantum gravity stellar collapse, let me know and I will dig up a paper or two by Parampreet Singh or an online seminar talk----something that you might find usable.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top