House Rich but Cash Poor or House Poor but Cash Rich?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrClapeyron
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When considering apartment options in the inner city, the discussion highlights the challenge of balancing budget with lifestyle desires. While some newer complexes offer appealing features like hardwood floors and balconies, they often exceed the budget, even if they adhere to the guideline of spending no more than one-third of monthly income on rent. The conversation emphasizes the importance of evaluating personal financial flexibility and disposable income when making a decision. Ultimately, the choice between a more expensive, desirable apartment and a modest option depends on individual priorities and financial circumstances.

Which is it?

  • House rich but cash poor

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • House poor but cash rich

    Votes: 3 75.0%

  • Total voters
    4
DrClapeyron
Today I was looking at apartments. I want to move to the inner city where the night-life scene is very big. Some of the newer complexes I looked at were quite expensive for my budget. I know there is a "don't spend more than 1/3 of your monthly income on rent" rule, but even though some places met the 1/3 rule I felt they were too much.

So that begs the question: should I get a place that is relatively new, great location, and 1/3 my monthly income, or should I go with something more modest?

The more expensive places included hardwood floors and balconies. Also, security looked better at the more expensive locations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have a choice of "house modest" and "cash modest."

And then you will go buy a car and spend 1/3 of income on payments.

It all depends on how much disposable income you do have to play around with.
It is a personnal choice, so I did not vote.
 
Back
Top