How are branching ratios determined? by experiment only?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WarpedWatch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Ratios
WarpedWatch
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Greetings,

when I look up how nuclear reactions take place, I often see branching ratios listed as percentages. So I'm wondering: are those ratios determined only by experiment or is there some fundamental theory that can predict what those percentages will be?

many thanks,
Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are studying a process X -> Y, the "rate" at which this process occurs is called \Gamma(X\rightarrow Y). This is computable. If we denote the TOTAL width (that is, the inverse lifetime, the sum of all possible decay widths for all possible Y, also computable) as \Gamma(X), then a "branching ratio" is defined as:

\frac{\Gamma(X\rightarrow Y)}{\Gamma(X)}

That is, it is the fraction of total decays of X that go into Y. So all this is computable, and it is always a fraction (percentage), since

\Gamma(X)=\sum_Y \Gamma(X\rightarrow Y).

I'm not sure if that answers your question...

These things are all computable from quantum mechanics/quantum field theory.
 
blechman said:
...

These things are all computable from quantum mechanics/quantum field theory.

Yes, that is what I wanted to know. I was wondering if this kind of phenomenon is something that could have been figured out without running direct experiments.

many, many thanks for your help,
Mark
 
yes, one can calculate partial widths directly from Fermi's Golden Rule in Quantum Mechanics (and its relativistic generalizations in Quantum Field Theory) and compare to experiment.

Happy I was able to help!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top