How are Cepheids used to measure distances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mooky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
AI Thread Summary
Cepheid variables are used to measure astronomical distances due to their predictable relationship between brightness and pulsation period. By measuring the period of a Cepheid, astronomers can determine its intrinsic brightness. This intrinsic brightness is then compared to its apparent brightness to calculate the distance using the inverse square law. Historically, the lack of nearby Cepheids for parallax measurement posed challenges, but advancements like the Hubble Space Telescope have improved distance measurements. Currently, there are 273 known Cepheids suitable for this method, with more expected from future missions like Gaia.
Mooky
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've read about this in four different textbooks and in several websites, but I still don't get it: how are Cepheids used to measure distances? I understand that Cepheids are stars whose brightness varies periodically; that the longer their period, the brighter they are; and that different Cepheids have different brightness and periods.

But, how is that used to measure distances?

Thanks,
M
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Note that the longer the period, the higher their intrinsic brightness. So you measure the period, and then from the relation between period and intrinsic brightness, you now know their intrinsic brightness - that is how bright they really are. Then you measure their apparent brightness - that is how bright they appear. Because of the inverse square law, if we have two objects of the same intrinsic brightness at two different distances, the one further away will appear fainter, just like with two identical street lights - the one further away will appear fainter. So if I know the intrinsic brightness and the apparent brightness, I can calculate the distance. Mathematically, the relation between the two is given here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitude_(astronomy)
 
That explains nothing, mate. They would need a Cepheid close enough for parallax measurement to use as a standard first.
 
Cryptonic said:
That explains nothing, mate. They would need a Cepheid close enough for parallax measurement to use as a standard first.

In fact, for many years, this point was the weakest link in the astronomical distance scale, since no Cepheids were close enough to use parallax to measure their distance. So historically other methods were used to get the distance to the nearest Cepheids and calibrate the relationship. Uncertainties in the calibration of the Cepheid relationship led to several re-assessments of the size of the universe. Try reading this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_distance_ladder

However, this is no longer an issue, since the Hubble space telescope was now able to measure the parallax of Delta Cephei, the prototypical cepheid. See this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Cephei
 
Cryptonic said:
That explains nothing, mate. They would need a Cepheid close enough for parallax measurement to use as a standard first.

And there now 273 such objects. There should be many more when Gaia launches.
 
Thank you, phyzguy. I wish textbooks were as clear and concise as you are.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top