Only 4% of the universe is composed of observable ordinary matter, while 23% consists of dark matter and the remaining 73% is dark energy. The claim that 96% of the universe is unobservable stems from a strict definition of 'observed.' Current scientific understanding of dark matter and dark energy remains limited, contributing to this perception. The discussion emphasizes that the unobservable aspects do not directly relate to a Theory of Everything. Overall, the complexities of dark matter and dark energy highlight significant gaps in our understanding of the universe.
#1
Provoker
2
0
I have a question. Only 4% of the universe is observable, how can that be?
This is not strictly true. 4% of the universe is made up of ordinary matter, 23% is dark matter and the rest is dark energy. We don't yet have a good understanding of what the last two are.
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
i want to just test a linear generator with galvanometer , the magnet is N28 and the wire (Cu) is of 0.6mm thikness and 10m long , but galvanometer dont show anthing ,
The core is PLA material (3d printed)
The magnet size if 28mm * 10mm * 5mm
If the universe is fundamentally probabilistic, and all possible outcomes are realized in some branch of the multiverse, does that invalidate the concept of scientific inquiry? If knowledge is merely a description of one particular branch of reality, does it have any inherent value?