How can a black hole be infinitely small?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of black holes and their size, specifically questioning how a black hole can be infinitely small while still exerting gravitational pull. Participants clarify that applying Newtonian physics to black holes is inappropriate, as their behavior is governed by General Relativity and quantum mechanics. The event horizon is described as a non-physical boundary that defines the black hole's influence rather than a tangible surface. The nature of singularities within black holes remains an open question in modern physics, highlighting the complexities of merging general relativity with quantum theory. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the limitations of current understanding regarding black holes and their properties.
Aaron380
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. First post here!

It's an odd thought and relax I'm expecting to be wrong but the more I think about this the more interested I get.. Let's say you're chilling in the centre of earth, you feel no (little) pull because the gravity of Earth cancels out in all directions.

If a black hole is infinitely small how does it's own gravity hold it in because there is no direction that the matter would be being pulled as its in the centre of itself?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are trying to apply Newtonian physics to a black hole, which is a situation which is far from being possible to describe in the Newtonian limit. It is simply not describable in those terms.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest and bcrowell
Aaron380 said:
Hi everyone. First post here!

It's an odd thought and relax I'm expecting to be wrong but the more I think about this the more interested I get.. Let's say you're chilling in the centre of earth, you feel no (little) pull because the gravity of Earth cancels out in all directions.

If a black hole is infinitely small how does it's own gravity hold it in because there is no direction that the matter would be being pulled as its in the centre of itself?
Where did you get the idea that black holes are "infinitely small"? From the outside, black holes are defined by their event horizons. What happens inside is an open question of current theory.
 
  • Like
Likes |Glitch|
mathman said:
Where did you get the idea that black holes are "infinitely small"? From the outside, black holes are defined by their event horizons. What happens inside is an open question of current theory.

Yeah I don't actually like that idea but it does appear to be the most common theory in research. The event horizon is not a physical border, simply a specific area of space with special meaning.
 
Aaron380 said:
The event horizon is not a physical border, simply a specific area of space with special meaning.
Be careful here! The event horizon is not a spatial surface, it is a null surface.
 
Aaron380 said:
Yeah I don't actually like that idea but it does appear to be the most common theory in research. The event horizon is not a physical border, simply a specific area of space with special meaning.
The idea of a "singularity" results from applying General Relativity without taking into account quantum theory. Applying both leads to contradictions, so what is really going on is an open question.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top