How can a function be presented or visualized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wajed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
Functions can be represented in various ways, including formulas, graphs, algorithms, and descriptions of their properties. It's essential to distinguish between the function itself and its representations, as not all functions can be expressed in every format. A function is fundamentally a set of ordered pairs, and understanding its definition is crucial regardless of the representation used. The discussion emphasizes that unfamiliar representations do not invalidate a function's legitimacy. Ultimately, the interpretation of a function should align with its defined properties and context.
wajed
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
"There are many ways to give a function: by a formula, by a plot or graph, by an algorithm that computes it, or by a description of its properties. Sometimes, a function is described through its relationship to other functions (see, for example, inverse function). In applied disciplines, functions are frequently specified by their tables of values or by a formula. Not all types of description can be given for every possible function, and one must make a firm distinction between the function itself and multiple ways of presenting or visualizing it."

This is a quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics )

in the last sentence he mentions "one must make a firm distinction between the function itself and multiple ways of presenting or visualizing it."

I`m now confused because when I think of a function I think of one of its representations e.g. formulas; the author says that I should make a distinction between the ways of presenting/visualizing and the function itself.. how do I do so? and when the word "function" is mentioned how should I interpret it in my mind?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Well you can think of a function any way you want really as long as you understand what it's defined to be. A f function is a set of ordered pairs such that if f(x) = y and f(x) = y' (or (x,y) and (x,y') are members of the set) then y = y'. It's useful to think about it as a curve in a plane or a set of ordered pairs or to look at an equation that can be used to find the values of the function depending on the context. I think that the Wikipedia page wanted to make the point that not all functions can be represented in each form; so if a function is defined in an way which you are unfamiliar with, and not as an equation or graph, then that doesn't mean that the function isn't defined properly or isn't a genuine function etc.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top