How Can an Expert Golfer Sink a Ball in One Stroke?

  • Thread starter Thread starter balling12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
An expert golfer can sink the ball in one stroke by calculating the resultant displacement from the novice's three strokes. The novice's movements include 3.90 m north, 2.10 m northeast, and 1.00 m at 30.0° west of south. To find the single displacement, one must sum the x and y components of these vectors. Drawing a diagram is a helpful first step in visualizing the problem. The final solution will provide both the distance and angle for the expert golfer's shot.
balling12
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A novice golfer on the green takes three strokes to sink the ball. The successive displacements are 3.90 m to the north, 2.10 m northeast, and 1.00 m at 30.0° west of south. Starting at the same initial point, an expert golfer could make the hole in what single displacement? At what angle?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to draw the diagram of the situation and that is as far as i have got.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
balling12 said:

Homework Statement


A novice golfer on the green takes three strokes to sink the ball. The successive displacements are 3.90 m to the north, 2.10 m northeast, and 1.00 m at 30.0° west of south. Starting at the same initial point, an expert golfer could make the hole in what single displacement? At what angle?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to draw the diagram of the situation and that is as far as i have got.
Drawing a diagram is an excellent start. Now connect the origin of the first vector with the arrow of the last, and that's the resultant displacement. You can solve for it by several ways; try summing the x and y components of each vector to get the resultant x and y components,(are you familiar with this??). Please show your work so we may assist.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top