How can billiard be used to illustrate any laws of mathematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thallium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Mathematics
Thallium
Messages
231
Reaction score
0
I indulged in a billiard match on Euro Sport and it got me wondering. How can billiard be used to illustrate any laws of mathematics?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
well it would only be approximate because of the inherent imperfection of models over theory, but you could demonstrate that the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection, if the billiard table were elliptic then the motion is deterministic, if there are more than three balls on an ordinary table it is chaotic, circular tables are also i think chaotic (these ideas arise in (quantum) cryptography etc but i can only point you at the relevant papers (yuri suhov i think)), and general mechanics laws up to a point.
it also demonstrates the amazing ability of the human mind and body to learn through repetition - despite the seemingly easy nature of the game, in simple terms of potting of snooker (not european billiards perhaps), machines are incredibly bad at it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top