How Can Chlorine Have a Half-AMU Mass Despite Having 17 Electrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrPickle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Mystery
AI Thread Summary
Chlorine's relative atomic mass of 35.5 amu arises from its isotopic composition, primarily consisting of two stable isotopes: 35 amu (approximately 75.75% abundance) and 37 amu (around 24.25% abundance). This isotopic mixture results in an average atomic mass that is not a whole number. The mass of electrons is negligible compared to protons and neutrons, contributing minimally to the overall atomic mass. The binding energies of isotopes may influence the apparent weight, but this effect is generally small and often overlooked. The confusion regarding atomic mass figures, especially for lighter elements like hydrogen, stems from the isotopic variations and the relative insignificance of electron mass in these calculations.
MrPickle
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I was looking at my periodic table in Chemistry today and noticed that Chlorine's relative mass was 35.5, how can it have half an amu when it has 17 electrons? That's not 0.5amu, is it?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The periodic table will give the average amu of the element in bulk from the ratio of isotopes. Chlorine has two major stable isotopes, 35 amu and 37 amu in ratios of ~75.75% and ~24.25% respectively. This gives an average weight of ~35.5.

I'm not entirely certain, but I think binding energies also play a role in the apparent weight of an element in bulk. The effect may be to small to bother considering for most purposes.
 
fedaykin said:
I'm not entirely certain, but I think binding energies also play a role in the apparent weight of an element in bulk. The effect may be to small to bother considering for most purposes.

Problem is not that the effect is too small, problem is it is masked by the fact that you have already mentiond - all elements are mixtures of isotopes.
 
I was once confused by the periodic table's amu figures for those small elements. The fact that hydrogen is \approx 1.008 made me think the electron was playing the role of that extra amu. As fedaykin said, it has to do with the isotopes (amount of neutrons present) that affects the amu of the element.
As your teacher/professor would've told you, the mass of the electron is so small compared to the proton/neutron, that it can be considered negligible. Somewhere in the range of 1/2500 mass. So one of the larger known elements, say 100 atomic number, those electrons would only add 0.04 amu to the element.
 
Mentallic said:
Somewhere in the range of 1/2500 mass.

More like 11836.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top