B How can gravity act on a photon?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity acts on photons not because they possess mass, but due to their energy, which has an equivalent mass in the context of General Relativity. The theory posits that mass and energy alter the geometry of spacetime, creating curvature that affects the paths of particles and waves. In a black hole, this curvature is so extreme that all paths lead to the singularity, preventing anything, including light, from escaping. Thus, light cannot escape a black hole not due to a force acting on it, but because the spacetime itself is curved in such a way that it redirects the light back toward the singularity. Ultimately, gravity is a manifestation of this curvature rather than a force in the traditional sense.
Simon Peach
Messages
80
Reaction score
17
Black hole or more correctly the event horizon will not let anything past through it, from inside to outside, ok.
But then we get to a particle with zero mass eg. photon. How can gravity act on that particle, surely for gravity to act there must be mass? Or does it act on the electromagnetic force? If so then the EMF must have some form of gravity, that is to say the wave form it's self. Help?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Gravity acts on mass-energy. A photon with energy hμ has mass equivalent hμ/c2.
 
My understanding based mostly on what I've read here at PF or from links given to me:

The key here is to understand that General Relativity (the theory which predicts black holes and our current models of gravity and such) is a geometric theory. The presence of mass or energy literally changes the geometry of spacetime in such a way as to alter the paths that objects or disturbances take through spacetime. When there is mass or energy present, we say that it causes a curvature of spacetime. This curvature changes spacetime from being flat, like regular Euclidean geometry you learned in middle or high school, into a non-Euclidean geometry.

In non-Euclidean geometry, two objects (or disturbances like EM waves) which initially start out along parallel paths can end up having their paths converge or diverge despite the fact that no forces are acting on them. Gravity is the former, where objects get closer together despite having no attractive forces between them because their paths through spacetime are curved in such a way as to converge. The steeper the curvature, the faster the paths converge (i.e. the stronger the gravity, the large the acceleration on each object). To continue moving in a straight path, you would need to apply a force, perhaps by using a rocket engine, to counteract this curvature. Much like how you need to turn your steering wheel slightly in order to keep moving in a straight line on roads that are angled slightly. The stronger the curvature, the more force needed to counteract it.

For a black hole, spacetime is curved so strongly beyond the event horizon that there is no force that can be applied that can completely counteract it. You may be able to delay your arrival, but all paths eventually converge to the singularity. So even light itself cannot escape a black hole because there are no paths through spacetime that lead back to the "outside world"!

You can find a great amount of information of on SR and GR at the following link, but it is rather advanced: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/grnotes/
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom and stoomart
Drakkith said:
My understanding based mostly on what I've read here at PF or from links given to me:

The key here is to understand that General Relativity (the theory which predicts black holes and our current models of gravity and such) is a geometric theory. The presence of mass or energy literally changes the geometry of spacetime in such a way as to alter the paths that objects or disturbances take through spacetime. When there is mass or energy present, we say that it causes a curvature of spacetime. This curvature changes spacetime from being flat, like regular Euclidean geometry you learned in middle or high school, into a non-Euclidean geometry.

In non-Euclidean geometry, two objects (or disturbances like EM waves) which initially start out along parallel paths can end up having their paths converge or diverge despite the fact that no forces are acting on them. Gravity is the former, where objects get closer together despite having no attractive forces between them because their paths through spacetime are curved in such a way as to converge. The steeper the curvature, the faster the paths converge (i.e. the stronger the gravity, the large the acceleration on each object). To continue moving in a straight path, you would need to apply a force, perhaps by using a rocket engine, to counteract this curvature. Much like how you need to turn your steering wheel slightly in order to keep moving in a straight line on roads that are angled slightly. The stronger the curvature, the more force needed to counteract it.

For a black hole, spacetime is curved so strongly beyond the event horizon that there is no force that can be applied that can completely counteract it. You may be able to delay your arrival, but all paths eventually converge to the singularity. So even light itself cannot escape a black hole because there are no paths through spacetime that lead back to the "outside world"!

You can find a great amount of information of on SR and GR at the following link, but it is rather advanced: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/grnotes/

Thanks I think I understand now. The light cannot escape, not because it is held back by gravity, but because the gravity is so strong that it curves spacetime to the extent that the light is curved back on it's self.
 
Simon Peach said:
Thanks I think I understand now. The light cannot escape, not because it is held back by gravity, but because the gravity is so strong that it curves spacetime to the extent that the light is curved back on it's self.

Pretty much. A minor clarification I'd like to make is that gravity doesn't cause spacetime curvature, curvature causes gravity. In this context, gravity is the effect that curvature has on objects moving through spacetime, namely that it causes them to appear to attract each other via a conventional force.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2 and Comeback City
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top