How can I describe techniques for estimating compound purity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xkieth
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Techniques for estimating compound purity include chromatography, titrations, and melting point analysis. Chromatography separates components based on their movement through a medium, allowing for purity assessment. Titrations involve reacting a compound with a reagent to determine concentration and purity. Melting point analysis identifies purity by comparing the observed melting point to known values. Utilizing textbooks and online resources can provide further guidance on these methods.
xkieth
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Its because I was sick, and wasn't able to get notes from my classmate(cuz their that bad and selfish)... The assignment states

"Write notes describing how the purity of compounds can be estimated using the following techniques: chromatography, titrations and melting point."

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried finding keywords google, but links would be ok for me too, I would appreciate the help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you not have a textbook?
 
Can you not google "determination purity chromatography (or titration or melting point)"?

Of course if you don't try to do anything you get exactly what your effort deserves.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top