How can i differentiate this ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abia ubong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiate
abia ubong
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I wonder if this can be differentiated ,if it can then what is the derivative of
[x^x^x^x^x^x...]^[(x^2)^(x^2)^(x^2)...]^[(x^3)^(x^3)^(x^3)...]^[(x^4)^(x^5)...]......
thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
what do all the dots mean? What order do you want the exponentiation in (it's not associative)?
 
From left to right i guess.I assume it resembles power tower.


Daniel.
 
The power tower:

y(x)=x^{x^{x^. . .}}}

is defined for:

e^{-e}\leq x\leq e^{1/e}

Note that the upper limit for a power tower is about 1.44467. However above, you're using "2" and larger values, you know x^2 and more. Thus I claim the expression is 0 for x<1, 1 for x=1, and infinity for x>1. It's derivative therefore is zero for 0\leq x\leq 1 and undefined for x>1.

However, I've just started looking at it and wouldn't bet more than a dollar.
 
Here's a better question - "Can you draw the graph of it ?"

If you cannot draw a graph of that thing, then chances are pretty good that you can't differentiate it either.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top