Dragonfall
- 1,023
- 5
How can I write down a closed form expression for the endpoints used in the construction of the Cantor set? i.e., 0, 1, 1/3, 2/3, 1/9, 2/9, 7/9, 8/9, etc.
The discussion revolves around expressing the endpoints of the Cantor set construction in closed form. Participants explore the nature of these endpoints, which include values like 0, 1, 1/3, 2/3, and others, while considering their density within the Cantor set.
The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the closed form and its correctness. Some have provided insights into the relationship between the endpoints and their base 3 representations, while others have raised questions about the assumptions underlying the proposed expressions.
There are mentions of proving the density of certain numbers within the Cantor set and constraints related to the representation of numbers in base 3. Some participants express confusion about the notation and its implications for higher values of n.
No, it isn't. when n= 1, the first "cut", the enpoints are 1/3 and 2/3 so that the intervals left are [0, 1/3], [2/3, 1] but when you remove the middle third of those, the endpoint are 0, 1/9, 2/9, 1/3= 3/9, 2/3= 6/9, 7/9, 8/9, 1. In your notation, k/3n, with n= 2, k is not 4 or 5. It gets worse with higher values of n.AKG said:The closed form is k/3n for all n, and for all 0 < k < 3n.
HallsofIvy said:Dragonfall, think in terms of base 3. Writing a number between 0 and 1 in base 3, the first "digit" (trigit?) may be 0, 1, or 2. If 0, the number is between 0 and 1/3; if 1, between 1/3 and 2/3; if 2, between 2/3 and 1. When you remove the middle third you remove all numbers have a "1" as first digit. Now, all numbers between 0 and 1/3 must have .00, .01, or .02 as first two digits, all numbers between 2/3 and 1 must have .20, .21, or .22 as first two digits. When you remove the middle third of each you remove all numbers that have 1 as the second digit. Do you see what happens in the limit?