How can I find the angle for a combined SHM graph without using a calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sadhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
To find the angle for a combined SHM graph without a calculator, it's important to recognize that the inverse tangent function only provides values between -π and π. For a continuous increase in angle as time progresses, one must account for the periodic nature of the tangent function, which repeats every π. Therefore, the angle can be expressed as the principal value plus multiples of π (e.g., principal value + nπ, where n is an integer). Since the user is working with Microsoft Math, they need a suitable expression that allows for plotting the graph without manual calculations. A proper understanding of the periodicity of the tangent function is essential for accurate graphing in this context.
sadhu
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
while doing physics , i just stuck on problem regarding mathematics

i wanted to plot the graph of combined SHM but in the formula there is a big problem regarding finding the angle of the given tangent.

i first used inverse tan but got a very weird wave, later i realized that inverse tan can give solutions between 0 -\pi but what i wanted was a continuous increase in angle.
i.e > \pior2*\pi, as angle increases with time(x -axis)

can somebody tell how to find angle
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your calculator is giving the "principal value", specifically that value of t between -\pi and \pi. Since tangent is periodic with period \pi your other values will be that number, plus \pi, plus 2\pi, plus 3\pi, etc.
 
the problem is that i am not working with a calculator , i am dealing with microsoft math
it can plot a graph once you have given the function to it. so nothing can be done manually , i just wanted an expression which works
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top