How can I find the inverse of this matrix using any method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony blair
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
AI Thread Summary
To find the inverse of the given matrix, one effective method is to use row reduction. Begin by adjoining the identity matrix to the original matrix and perform row operations to achieve a diagonal of all 1's on the left side. This process mirrors solving a system of equations and requires complete reduction for accuracy. The resulting matrix on the right side will be the inverse. Utilizing a calculator, such as a TI-89, can simplify finding the determinant during this process.
tony blair
Could someone show me how to determine the inverse to this
Any method



A solution today would be great!


A= 2 1 -3 1
-3 -2 0 2
2 1 0 -1
1 0 1 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
step one: enter the matrix into mathematica...

er... jk. :smile:


I presume you know how to do row reduction in the context of solving equations right?

The work done in inverting a matrix is the same as in solving a system of equations. You first adjoin an identity matrix to your matrix (instead of adjoining a single column). e.g.

Code:
/  2  1 -3  1 |  1  0  0  0 \
| -3 -2  0  2 |  0  1  0  0 |
|  2  1  0 -1 |  0  0  1  0 |
\  1  0  1  2 |  0  0  0  1 /

Now, you row reduce your original matrix, just like you would when solving a system of equations. You have to fully row reduce it so the left hand matrix has a diagonal of all 1's and 0's everywhere else (iow you can't partially reduce it). Then, the right hand matrix will be the inverse you were trying to compute.
 
But the simplest way to find the determinant of a large matrix is row reduction!
 
Actually, I found the determinant by entering the matrix into my TI-89 calculator!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top