How can I find the minimum value for the sum of absolute values?

Jorge
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,


I have been having problems finding the way to minimize the sum of absolute values. Specificaly I am looking for the value of X that will minimize the sum|Xi-V|<-- i=1,...n . I know that V should be equal to the mean value of X. But I do not know the correct approach to finding this minimum.

Can I square the Xi-V and differentiate? or is there another approach?

Thanks...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So is Xi X times i?
 
Sorry about that,

i---> is the sub index. Meaning X1...Xn.

Then it is Sum from i={1 to n }of |Xi-V|.
 
Well then that expression is completely independent of the value of X. Do you mean you are looking for a V to minimize that expression? If you are then you can let V be any value between X(n/2) and X(n/2+1) if n is even, and you can let V be X((n+1)/2) if n is odd.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top