How can I improve my performance in lab classes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Same-same
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes Lab
AI Thread Summary
Preparing for a lab class, especially in an introductory circuits course, involves several strategies to boost confidence and efficiency. Understanding the experiment through pre-lab preparation and lectures is essential. Writing a stepwise procedure in one's own words before class helps clarify the tasks at hand. Collaborating effectively with lab partners can enhance productivity; for instance, dividing responsibilities—one person setting up equipment while the other prepares materials—can lead to better results. It's important to focus on personal understanding rather than comparing oneself to faster peers, as this can lead to self-doubt and confusion. A practical tip is to outline the first three actions to take upon entering the lab, which can help mitigate anxiety and provide direction. Overall, preparation, collaboration, and self-assurance are key to succeeding in lab environments.
Same-same
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I have my first real lab class this semester (intro to circuits), and I'm kind of nervous. In high school chemistry I always felt like a burden in lab class; I could do fine on the tests, but in lab I always felt behind. By the time I thought to do something my teammates were usually already doing it. Basically, I felt slow. I did better in AP physics, but I still didn't feel competent.
I'm hoping to change that and do well in this lab class, however, I'm not sure what to do. So, other than completing the pre-lab and understanding lectures, how do I prepare/study for a lab class?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing I learned from my lab classes was that if your partner is doing things fast and acts like he knows what he is doing without even reading the manual and you still have no clue what the setup is , even though you gave a good try at understanding what you have to do. They are doing it WRONG. If it isn't very time limited lab let them do their thing, than try doing it your way.
 
I would read the experiment and write up a stepwise procedure in my own words, before class. After I know how the experiment is going to work, I would look for ways to assemble it in pieces more efficiently.

An example of this in chemistry would be, while I constructed the ring stand, distillation apparatus and heating unit, my partner (who I trust) would be weighing chemicals for the experiment and picking up equipment that wasn't available in the immediate area. Most of the time we were the last to finish and had the best results.

I slow down considerably when I doubt myself and start looking at what the group next to me is doing.
 
something my o-chem professor told me that was useful was write the first 3 things you are going to do when you walk in the door of the lab room, so you don't have the deer in headlights look when you walk in and you start going
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top