How Can I Quickly Improve My Math Skills?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bellabob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Skills Tips
Bellabob
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I want to be better at math. I'm not horrible, but I'm not great either. I want to be able to calculate things fast and with accuracy.

Tips?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do the exercises.
 
Math as in arithmetic? There are many tricks into computing stuff fast, but I don't think it is worth knowing. You can ask Google for that.

If you are referring to math as in not arithmetic, then follow BloodyFrozen's advice.
 
Bellabob said:
I want to be better at math. I'm not horrible, but I'm not great either. I want to be able to calculate things fast and with accuracy.

Tips?

Think about math. Read what other people are working on, and what stuff is out there. Communicate with other researchers (may not necessarily be mathematicians but people working on it, and that can include engineers/physicists/computer scientists/natural scientists and so on).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top