How Can I Relate Measurements from a Gyroscope and Accelerometer?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on relating measurements from a gyroscope and two accelerometers positioned at either end of a rectangular tube. The gyroscope measures angular displacement, while the accelerometers measure linear speed. The user seeks to understand how to convert the gyroscope's angular measurements into tangential acceleration to compare with the accelerometer's linear acceleration. Additionally, the conversation explores how to derive angular acceleration from the linear acceleration of the accelerometers, emphasizing the role of the radius in these calculations. The overall goal is to establish a predictive relationship between the measurements of the two types of sensors.
gup08
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi Physics Forums,

I have two sensors that I am trying to relate:
- One gyroscopes measuring angle
- Two accelerometer measuring linear speed

I have put the gyroscope in the middle of a long rectangular tube. While the accelerometers are at each end of this tube.

I need help getting started in using the measurement from one accelerometer and the gyroscope to predict the measurement from the second accelerometer or to use the accelerometer to predict the measurement from the gyroscope.

The movement will consist of rotating the beam 15 deg each way about the middle of the beam. Illustration is shown:

gvEbeDj.png

For the gyroscope I would have to convert the angle to tangential acceleration. And that is what I can use to compare directly to the linear acceleration of the accelerometer?

How could also go from the linear acceleration given by the accelerometer to angular acceleration?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
gup08 said:
And that is what I can use to compare directly to the linear acceleration of the accelerometer?
Assuming gravitational acceleration doesn't play a role: Sure.
gup08 said:
How could also go from the linear acceleration given by the accelerometer to angular acceleration?
The same as for the opposite direction, the two just differ by a factor r, the radius where the linear speed/acceleration is evaluated.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top