How Can I Safely Conduct Liquid Sodium Wicking Experiments in a Sealed Tube?

AI Thread Summary
Conducting liquid sodium wicking experiments in a sealed tube requires careful consideration of materials and safety precautions. A transparent quartz tube may be suitable, but it’s essential to confirm its compatibility with sodium at high temperatures. The setup should involve purging oxygen and using an inert gas like argon, ideally within a glove box to enhance safety. If a transparent option is not feasible, alternatives like stainless steel may be necessary, although this would require X-ray inspection for observation. Additional safety measures beyond a fire extinguisher should be implemented to address the risk of tube failure.
dpage
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I need to test a system for liquid sodium wicking under high temperatures. The setup is as follows:

Solid sodium pellets are placed in a tube which is then purged of oxygen (replaced with Argon). The tube is sealed and then heated to 300-400 degrees Celsius and agitated with a shaking mechanism.​

My questions are the following:

Where can I find a good reference on setting up sealed tube experiments(i.e. materials, methods to seal the tube, etc...)?

It is preferable that the tube be transparent for observation. What type of tube might I use(is quartz o.k. with sodium at these High temperatures?)?

What additional safety precautions are needed in case the tube cracks? It seems like an outer metal cylinder is typically used for this, but this is not possible for an experiment involving agitation. Also we would like to be able to observe...Anything we can do besides have a fire extinguisher on hand??​

Much Thanks,
dpage
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try reviewing this paper: T. Gnanasekaran, K.H. Mahendran, G. Periaswami, C.K. Mathews, H.U. Borgstedt, Stability of ternary oxygen compounds of molybdenum in liquid sodium, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Volume 150, Issue 2, October 1987, Pages 113-127, ISSN 0022-3115, DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(87)90068-7.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TXN-480TP8C-1PN/2/bb6423754f402fbe9be88e35a892ce0f)

See if they used a quartz crucible with liquid sodium, or perhaps asked someone in the chemistry department.

It may be possible to use a quartz tube, e.g., a test tube that is then sealed at the top.

I'd purge the oxygen first before admitting the sodium, which is probably stored in oil or inert gas.

Peform the experiement in a glove box or chamber in an iner gas, e.g., argon.

If one cannot use a glass or transparent ceramic, then one would have to use something like a stainless steel, or perhaps aluminum tube. In that case, one would have to use X-rays to view inside, and that requires radiation protection/shielding.

Folks have looked at sodium bonded fuel elements.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top