How can I simplify this fraction: (x+2)/(x-1) * (4x+1)/(x-1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DLxX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
DLxX
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
\frac {x+2} {x-1} \frac \frac {4x+1} {x-1}

Would using the bowtie method work? Cross multiply and then subtract the two answers found from each other, and put that result over the multiplaction of the two denominators. ?

EDIT: I messed up the Latex thing. THe 4x-1 and the x-1 are supposed to be a fraction under the x+2/x-1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So you mean

\frac{\frac{x+2}{x-1}}\frac{4x+1}{x-1}}
?

You learned how to divide fractions in the fourth grade: invert the denominator and multiply. This is:
\frac{x+2}{x-1}*\frac{x-1}{4x+1}

Can you reduce that?
 
Agreed. Dividing is the same as multiplying by the reciprocal. So when you do this the x - 1's cancel out.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top