How can I solve a 3D coordinate problem involving rotation and a given point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pimanian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate
pimanian
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been thinking about this problem for awhile, but have no idea to even begin solving it. Was wondering if anyone has a clue to help me started?
There's a point (x0,y0,z0) in 3D. There is a line on the X-Y plane. This line is say theta degrees (0 - 360) about the Y-axxis. If the point (x0, y0, z0) is rotated phi degrees about this line, what is the new position?
This is just a problem I thought up, so I don't even know if there is enough information to solve it.
Please help me, let me know what's a good step to solve it? Should I use Cartesian system, or use another one?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are 'infinity' of lines that form the same angle with the y-axis. So if the exact line's not given, I don't think this is solvable.
Anyway, are you sure this statement is correct?
pimanian said:
say theta degrees (0 - 360)
Shouldn't that be 0 <= theta <= 90?
Viet Dao,
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top