How can I solve for W in this tricky statics problem without exceeding 1050N?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paul11273
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics Stuck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the weight W in a physics problem involving tensions T1, T2, and T3, with constraints that neither T1 nor T2 can exceed 1050N. The user initially struggled with the equations and the free body diagram but received guidance to substitute 1050 for either T1 or T2 to simplify the problem. After applying this method, they successfully determined that W is 609N when T2 is 1050N, while T1 is 544N. The confusion stemmed from the presence of T3 and the number of unknowns, but the clarification helped resolve the issue. The user expressed gratitude for the assistance and plans to engage more with the forum.
paul11273
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with a HW question that has been driving me crazy for a few days now. I have to solve for W ( a hanging weight) that will not cause either T1 or T2 to exceed 1050N. So far I have drawn the free body diagram that is attached as a word doc, and the angles I found based on the dimensions given. The problem gives T3 as 680N and shows the slope to be 8/5. This causes (I think) T3 and T2 to be directly in line with each other. I feel like I am letting this fact throw me off. Also, when I start trying to break up each one into component vectors, it seems that I have too many unknowns. I have tried several different approaches but each leads me to an incorrect answer. The book gives a range for W of 0 < W < 609N.
Can you help me figure this one out? Atleast lead me in the right direction? Thanks.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
These are the two equations:

1. cos(28)T2 - cos(53)T1 = cos(28)680
2. sin(53)T1 + sin(28)T2 - sin(28)680 = W

You are trying to find W where T1 or T2 is equal to 1050. So substitute 1050 in for T1 or T2, and solve for the other T. Then solve for the weight.
 
Thanks!
I can't believe that I killed myself over this question. I had those two equations, but failed to see that I need to sub in 1050 for either T1 or T2, then solve for the other.
I have completed it, and found that T2 will be 1050N when the W is 609N, and T1 will 544N.
I let T3 confuse me, and it had me thinking the problem would be more complicated.
Thanks again. You have sold me on this forum. I will check here regularly, and hopefully I can contribute as well.
 
You have 3 unknowns: T1, T2, and W
You have 2 equations, as Moose pointed out.
You also have 2 inequalities, one of which you must "max out", and the other of which you must ensure holds. Pick one of the inequalities, arbitrarily, and max it out (turn it into an equality). This fixes one of your unknowns (T1 or T2, whichever you chose). Then, solve the equations, and afterwards make sure the other inequality holds. If it does not, then just go back and max out the other inequality and solve.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top