How can I solve this advanced polynomial division problem?

ssb
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Some of you may have read my troubles that I had in this thread
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=162079

Now I am having more troubles with more advanced problems.

I started with this problem:

[4y^2 - 7y - 12] / [(y)(y+2)(y-3)]

The problem is that I set it up the same way as I did in that thread and I am able to solve for A, B, and C:
A= 3
B= 9/5
C= 1/5

so I integrate 3/y + (9/5)/(y+2) + (1/5)/(y-3)

and i get

3ln(y) + 9/5ln(y+2) + 1/5ln(y-3)

Beautiful right? Well I am suppost to find the integral over the area from 1 to 2.

When I plug in 1 and 2 into the 1/5 ln (y-3) it yields a negetive number and you can't take the ln of a negetive number!

Im sure I am making the mistake in the polynomial division somewhere but i don't know. I am thinking there is a way to simplify the original question first before i solve for A B and C... right? any insite would be wonderful!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ok so I forgot to mention that I also tried to take the absolute values of the value inside the ln and it still did not work.
 
Oh ok. You didn't set up your equations right. With a denominator with three factors, it becomes (you can see this by yourself):

A(y)(y+2) + B(y)(y-3) + C(y+2)(y-3) = 4y^2 - 7y - 12

A(y^{2} + 2y) + B(y^{2} - 3y) + C(y^{2} - y - 6) = 4y^2 - 7y - 12

(A + B + C)y^{2} + (2A - 3B - C)y - 6C = 4y^2 - 7y - 12If we want A, B and C to be constants, we compare each term with one another (equality of polynomials theorem). We find C = 2, and then we get 2A - 3B - 2 = -7 and A + B + 2 = 4. Now we have two unknowns with two equations and we solve.
 
Last edited:
What Werg22 is talking about is setting the coefficients of the same powers equal.


Another very nice method is, since the equation must be true for all x, to take specific values for x. Since the left hand side of the equation Werg22 gave you involve factors y, y+2, and y- 3, let y= 0, -2, and 3 in succesion. Your equations become:
x= 0 0+ 0+ C(2)(-3)= -12 so C= 2
x=-2 0+ B(-2)(-5)+ 0= 4(-2)2- 7(-2)- 12= 16+14-12= 18 so B= 9/5
x= 3 A(3)(5)+ 0+ 0= 4(3)2-7(3)-12= 36- 21-12= 3 so A= 1/5.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top