How Can Light Transmission and Reflection Exceed 100% in an Optics Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
In an optics experiment involving a transparent dish, it was observed that 55% of light was transmitted and 55% was reflected, raising questions about energy conservation since total values exceed 100%. A hypothesis suggested that the glass could be in an excited state, releasing more light upon de-excitation when illuminated. To test this, measuring emitted electromagnetic radiation in a vacuum at near absolute zero with a spectrometer was proposed. Additional theories included the possibility of a semi-reflective surface behind the dish causing light to bounce back and the relativistic Doppler effect influencing perceived intensity. The discussion also questioned the relevance of the dish's curved surface in the experiment.
erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7
You have a glass (or plastic) dish (like a small transparent dish). You shine light onto its flat surface. Your lab partner discovers that 55% of the light has been transmitted, 55% is reflected. What is the absorbance of the dish (not in the log scale, just as a regular %age)?
State a hypothesis and the way you would test it.

I was asked this today in an interview. This is what I said-

So, clearly the answer can't be -10, right, cos that just violates energy conservation.

So I think that the glass itself could have been in an excited state and therefore, when we shone light on it, it sort of got de-excited because of the collisions with the incoming light photons and therefore, we got more light than the total incoming light released.

Also, the way that we would test this hypothesis is by taking the glass thing into a vacuum, in darkness and with temperatures close to 0 K and measuring any electromagnetic radiation being emitted from the same.

We could measure that using a spectrometer sort of thing (like infrared glasses measure heat, and we can see bodies glowing).

This is what I said during the interview. The interviewer (when he'd asked me what I liked to do, I'd said I like to sit and think, and browse the internet) then said that I should now think up 9 more solutions to this problem since that's my favourite pastime and email it to him.

Other solutions I've thought of:

1. Maybe there's a semi-reflective surface behind the dish, off of which the transmitted light bounced, and went back through the dish, reading as reflected light.

2. Relativistic doppler effect could alter the intensity perceived by the glass.

Could there be any other answers?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
erisedk said:
You have a glass (or plastic) dish (like a small transparent dish). You shine light onto its flat surface.
Why does the question say "dish" if only the flat part is investigated? Is the curved part not receiving any light? What exactly is measured, and how?
 
A.T. said:
Why does the question say "dish" if only the flat part is investigated? Is the curved part not receiving any light? What exactly is measured, and how?
That's just what I remember of how he phrased it. It doesn't really have much significance. The curved part is receiving light. I just have a laser beam that I'm shining on a small glass dish.
 
erisedk said:
The curved part is receiving light.
Can it focus the reflected / refracted light so you get increased intensity at the sensors?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top