How Can Mechanical Energy Be Converted to DC Electricity Without Magnets?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on methods to convert mechanical energy into direct current (DC) electricity without the use of magnets. Participants explore various alternatives, including electrostatic generators and friction-based methods, while emphasizing the need for efficiency in energy conversion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about converting mechanical energy to DC electricity without magnets, expressing a need for at least 75% efficiency.
  • Another participant suggests the piezoelectric effect as a potential method but does not address the efficiency concern.
  • A participant mentions electrostatic generators like the Whimshurst Machine and the Van der Graaff generator, noting that generating low voltage and high current without magnets may not be feasible.
  • There is a discussion about the use of friction to generate heat and then convert it using thermoelectric or pyroelectric effects, though efficiency is questioned.
  • One participant clarifies that while electromagnets are not excluded, they require power to maintain the magnetic field, which could negate the energy generated.
  • Another participant references historical self-excited DC generators used in automobiles, suggesting they operate without external magnets and can generate significant current.
  • Counterarguments arise regarding the efficiency of electromagnets, with one participant asserting that power loss is minimal in car alternators and large-scale generators.
  • Concerns are raised about the size and strength of magnets needed for certain designs, such as Faraday's disk, with a participant seeking advice on sourcing appropriate materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of generating DC electricity without magnets, with some suggesting alternatives and others asserting limitations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most efficient method.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about efficiency and the practicality of different methods, but these assumptions remain unverified within the discussion.

roboticmehdi
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello world. Is there any way to convert mechanical energy into DC electricity energy WITHOUT using any magnets ? I know there is homopolar generator but it uses magnet and as I said I need something that doesn't use any magnets. I also know there are stuff that use friction (triboelectric effect), but they are very inefficient and waste a lot of mechanical energy input into heat. I need something fairly efficient, for example at least around 75%, you know what I mean. Also please don't say that I can do that by using self exciting ac generator then using rectifier to make it dc, I need direct DC generation. Any ideas ? *_*
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is the Piezo Electric effect.

I have a flame lighter in my barbeque that delivers an awesome spark.

What do you have against magnets? They are cheap and cost nothing to run.
 
There are a number of electrostatic generators that generate DC without magnets. The Whimshurst Machine was a favourite in my School. Then it was decided that they are too dangerous and they now use the Van der Graaff (much less impressive in many ways).

But to generate DC with low volts and high current is not possible without using magnets in one form or another, I reckon.
 
no magnets.

are electromagnets and DC generators excluded as well?
 
You can generate heat with friction and then convert it with the thermoelectric or the pyroelectric effect.
 
@jim hardy: no, electromagnets are not excluded, only permanent magnets are excluded. but even with electromagnets there is problem. you have to supply current to it to keep field and that itself would consume most of power from generator if not all.

@DragonPetter: those effect are very inefficient, around 3-4%.

Somebody knows please ? *__*
 
@vk6kro: cheap ?! :D they are cheap but so tiny. I want to make faradays disk ( homopolar generator ) and I think I need something with diameter at least 25cm with strong field so that I don't have to spin it at very high speeds. Any ideas ?
 
but even with electromagnets there is problem. you have to supply current to it to keep field and that itself would consume most of power from generator if not all.

All US automobiles prior to about 1959 used a self excited DC generator (Europeans called them dynamo) which required nothing but rotation to make 30 amps. No magnets just armature, field and brushes , with a clever electromechanical regulator for control. Unlike an alternator it'll bootstrap itself up and supply its own field with no external supply.

read up on the simple dynamo , if it seems to do what you asked
Peruse the junkyards for one of these:

stude_gen.jpg


I liked them because even with completely dead battery (or no battery) you could push-start the car.
Chrysler went to alternators in 1959, Ford ~1964.

old jim
 
Last edited:
roboticmehdi said:
even with electromagnets there is problem. you have to supply current to it to keep field and that itself would consume most of power from generator if not all.
This is not correct. Car alternators have an electromagnetic field magnet which uses a very small proportion of the Power generated. Likewise, large scale Generating Sets use electromagnetic field windings. Power loss isn't an issue.
 
  • #10
and that '51 Studebaker generator pictured makes its own 2 amps of field current, delivering up to 30 amps for the vehicle .

Reason they went to alternators is they are cheaper to manufacture (no big copper commutator) and alternator makes more current at idle speed - which was becoming an issue in stop & go traffic..
 
  • #11
roboticmehdi said:
@vk6kro: cheap ?! :D they are cheap but so tiny. I want to make faradays disk ( homopolar generator ) and I think I need something with diameter at least 25cm with strong field so that I don't have to spin it at very high speeds. Any ideas ?

Have a look at these:
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/5pcs-20mm-x-3mm-Hole-5mm-Disc-Disk-Rare-Earth-Neodymium-Strong-fridge-Magnets-/170854284960?pt=AU_Supplies&hash=item27c7b57ea0

(prices are given in Australian dollars which is about the same as US$.)

Or look through these:
http://www.ebay.com.au/sch/i.html?_...magnets&_osacat=0&_trksid=p3286.c0.m270.l1313

The hole would be necessary so you could put screws into hold the magnets in place. Glueing them would be a nighmare.
If you had one every 40 mm on a flat surface, you could draw up a scale diagram to see how many you would need.
I make it about 60 per side. 18 + 15 + 12 + 9 + 5 + 1 in concentric circles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K